Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article

Time to End the EU’s Needless Review of Extraterritorial Joint Ventures

James R.M. Killick, White & Case Antitrust Article, February 2013.

See James Killick's resume

Click here to read the full article online

The EU merger control regime is highly respected worldwide, and rightfully so. The European Commission ("Commission") has, over the past 20 years, delivered rigorous yet efficient review in a transparent and pragmatic manner. However, there are some specific areas that are in need of reform.

This paper focuses on the area that is, in the author’s view, the most obvious candidate for reform; the unjustifiable obligation to notify extraterritorial joint ventures ("JVs"). No business should object to Commission scrutiny of concentrations that could have an impact on competition within the EEA. However, where a concentration does not, and indeed cannot, have any effect on competition in the EEA, an obligation to notify the Commission is objectionable as a matter of principle and, given the costs involved, undesirable as a matter of economic efficiency.

In this paper the author: 1) considers how existing rules can require notification of extraterritorial JVs; 2) demonstrates how these rules have led to absurd results in practice; 3) explains why the status quo is unsatisfactory on policy and practical grounds; and 4) put forward our view as to how existing rules and practices can be revised to eradicate this anomaly.

© 2014 - Institute of Competition Law Download our brochure